Yes I agree - it is high.
That is intentional.

As far as scaling goes, I personally trade the system with 10% scaling. I assume over time as the system proves itself other will do so as well with various scaling factors, but I will be the first to admit that because of the small profit targets, it just isn't worth it to scale at less than 10% (even though you could), and even then only with a super-low discount commission. But thats the nature of this beast, I am just being upfront about it all in advance. If you look at the annualized returns so far, take 10% of that, then subtract the subscription fee, you get a nice return. Of course that spretty meaningless for any NEW systems, but thats why the C2 concept is so great. Anyone can follow along for free, and anyone can even get 2 weeks worth of live signals free, but you can't expect a vendor to give it away for free forever. I have said before and I still feel that as a subscriber it is pure gambling to use real money on a system with less than a 6-month OR 100 trade history, which stuck 100% to its rules for that entire period and did NOT adjust them. Not that I mind being joined early on by gamblers, but everyone should be fully aware of the situation. It makes me sick to see people on here losing money (I have done so myself) just because they TRUSTED a vendor who didnt have a track record. Hell, its hard enough to trust the ones that HAVE track records! Just look at the Hawk board!
W