Forum: System: Doubleday Advanced Small Cap
| |
| Subject: | WARNING TO ALL USERS OF THIS SYSTEM |
| Posted by: | Index ( C2 Score: 975 ) |
 |
| |
|
| When: | 7/08/06 (9:26) | |
| Systems: | |
|
|
|
|
| | WARNING TO ALL POTENTIAL SUBSCRIBERS OF THIS SYSTEM:
This vendor has committed multiple acts of deception against the C2 community as he has:
- posted fake review glowing reviews of his systems (which he had to retract)
- run software to generate thousands of fake page views to several of his systems here to make it look popular
- Fabricated stories and used aliases (J Tyll) to defend his actions, including that he has a wide following in the equities industry In his own words "I am very flattered by the reviews and page views, and I hope to be worthy of such praise. Many of my subscribers have been following me for years, and I have a wide network of contacts, which may explain the page views."
- used multiple fake IDs to point to his systems from the "My Analyst" page to fake the appearance of popularity (still there, at the time of this writing), since vendors cannot point to their own system. Some of the fake aliases have included: Matthew Graham, M graham, J Tyll, Jen Tyll, Jennifer Tyll, and I suspect jimmy perko and other strange sounding names.
- issued various implied threats against people who called him out on this
As of this writng, Matthew Graham still refuses to acknowledge anything other than "yes, he issued the fake reviews." Even this was with much reluctance and trying to pass it off as a small thing. He will only bend when caught.
STAY FAR FAR AWAY !!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| |
| Subject: | WARNING TO ALL USERS OF THIS SYSTEM |
| Posted by: | jimmy perko |
|
| |
|
| When: | 7/08/06 (10:43) | |
|
|
|
|
| | In response to post by Index of 7/08/06 (9:26) WARNING TO ALL POTENTIAL SUBSCRIBERS OF THIS SYSTEM:
This vendor has committed multiple acts of deception against the C2 community as he has:
...
See entire
What kind of a paranoid idiot are you Ross Canfield. First do some research before you post. I am Jimmy Perko and have nothing to do neither with Matthew Graham nor with you. And I dont like your name |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| |
| Subject: | WARNING TO ALL USERS OF THIS SYSTEM |
| Posted by: | Index ( C2 Score: 975) |
|
| |
|
| When: | 7/08/06 (13:29) | |
| Systems: | |
|
|
|
|
| | In response to post by jimmy perko of 7/08/06 (10:43) What kind of a paranoid idiot are you Ross Canfield. First do some research before you post. I am Jimmy Perko and have nothing to do neither with Matthew Graham nor with you. And I dont like your name
First do some research before you post. I am Jimmy Perko and have nothing to do neither with Matthew Graham...
Thank you for the suggestion to do research. Here is what I find "Jimmy" aka "Matthew Graham."
1) Matthew Graham has already demonstrated he has used AT LEAST 5 different fake IDs to follow his system vie My Analyst pages: M. Graham. Matthew Graham, J. Tyll, Jen Tyll, Jennifer Tyll.
2) The fake Ms. Tyll has already posted at least 3 times in fake defense of Matthew on the first thread. This is Matthew Graham's habit.
3) the fake Jimmy Perko happens to start following a system (at 16:24 June 26) on the day it is created (June 26). Was an unknown system THAT interesting to you???
4) the fake Jimmy Perko never posted a single time to the forums before, but suddenly happens to notice his name buried in the middle of a long post, exactly 60 minutes after the long post was published. Amazingly good eyes!!!! Somehow it seems more likely Matthew Graham as HIMSELF probably noticed this first, given that you tend to view or answer responses to every private message you tortured me with, within 30 minutes or less...
5) This first time "Jimmy" noticed this posting, was for a system he wasn't even tracking on his "My Analyst" page. You should check first!
6) Jimmy Perko is so thorough that he manages to see and respond to identical in about 6 OTHER forums within 15 minutes. How did the always before quiet Jimmy notice these other 6 so quickly? It is more likely Matthew Graham noticed them.
Prove me wrong, "Jimmy". Tell me your city and state, and I will look you up on http://superpages.com and then we can verify you exist. But remember, I will contact the "Jimmy Perko", so providing a fake person will not help you (I expect the answer to be "my number is unlisted" or "I don't have a phone number)
But the reality is, that Matthew Graham is addicted to his deception. So as I said before, STAY FAR AWAY FROM THIS SERVICE
|
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| |
| Subject: | WARNING TO ALL USERS OF THIS SYSTEM |
| Posted by: | jimmy perko |
|
| |
|
| When: | 7/08/06 (18:01) | |
|
|
|
|
| | In response to post by Index of 7/08/06 (13:29) First do some research before you post. I am Jimmy Perko and have nothing to do neither with Matthew Graham...
...
See entire
You really are an idiot hah. Dont waste my fking time with your paranoia. Fking loser. |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| |
| Subject: | WARNING TO ALL USERS OF THIS SYSTEM |
| Posted by: | Index ( C2 Score: 975) |
|
| |
|
| When: | 7/08/06 (18:10) | |
| Systems: | |
|
|
|
|
| | In response to post by jimmy perko of 7/08/06 (18:01) You really are an idiot hah. Dont waste my fking time with your paranoia. Fking loser.
Good response Matthew Graham! You really addressed the issues with that one. Did it really take you several hours to come up with that one? Why don't you try a few other alternative identities? hee hee hee :) |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
What is the C2 Score?
Collective2 rates every trading advisor in its database and assigns a score between 100 and 1000.
In general, a rating above 500 is good. A rating above 700 is excellent.
Collective2 Ratings are recalculated daily based on the entire performance history in our database. The exact formula we use is proprietary, but there are several key variables that go into the Collective2 Rating. One of the most important factors is the length of time we have been able to observe the performance of the trader. Another key factor is the amount by which the trader over-performs or under-performs the S&P 500 index. Finally, the choppiness of the trader's results is taken into account. Certainly a more consistent trader will be rated more highly than a trader with erratic results.
