|
|
These trading results are maintained and verified by Collective2, an independent company.
Collective2 (C2) is a Web site that monitors over 8,720 trading systems. We are not
affiliated with the trading system developer. We merely verify the results of
a trading system, by measuring a system's advice versus real-time market data.
Use of Collective2 to verify system results or to research trading systems is
free. All system results presented on C2 must be regarded as hypothetical. You can learn more about the
limitations of hypothetical results.
|
 System Details: Have Fun
|
| |
|
Hypothetical Monthly Results (limitations of these statistics ?)
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
| 2007 | | | | +6.0% | +2.5% | +4.4% | +7.4% | +2.6% | +2.4% | +1.9% | +3.0% | +4.9% | | 2008 | +2.1% | +2.0% | +3.1% | (0.8%) | +1.2% | +2.0% | (1.8%) | (2%) | +2.5% | +2.4% | +1.6% | +3.0% | | 2009 | (1.4%) | - | +1.8% | +1.0% | (3.7%) | +0.4% | - | | | | | | |
|
|
 |
| Overview |
|
The system developer writes: Have Fun, trade smarter not harder.
|
|
| |
 | Real Trade Stats Available |
|
This system has been AutoTraded and sufficient data has been collected to allow us to overlay real brokerage execution data on top
of hypothetical trades. Would you like to see trade information gathered from subscribers' real brokerage accounts? |
|
|
|
|
| |
| You might also be interested in... |
|
If you are interested in Have Fun, we have some other systems you should consider... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Viewed 15,941 times |
| Tracked by 344 My Analyst pages |
| With commentary: 23 |
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
 |
July 18, 2008 |
Reviewer: AutoTrader of system |
|
|
Since I joined over 3 months ago, the win ratio has dropped to 50%, and the system has lost money, including fees. Like another review says, the losers are bigger than the winners, and the trades go against the trend, when sometimes the trend is unstoppable. With such trade management, each entry has to be spot-on, to keep the high win ratio. The lateest trade, the vendor just entered too soon (short ER2 at open at 688), and then held on (despite going 5 points into profit at one stage) without even moving the stop. Eventually the ER2 uptrend resumed, and we got sw [Show Entire] Since I joined over 3 months ago, the win ratio has dropped to 50%, and the system has lost money, including fees. Like another review says, the losers are bigger than the winners, and the trades go against the trend, when sometimes the trend is unstoppable. With such trade management, each entry has to be spot-on, to keep the high win ratio. The lateest trade, the vendor just entered too soon (short ER2 at open at 688), and then held on (despite going 5 points into profit at one stage) without even moving the stop. Eventually the ER2 uptrend resumed, and we got swept away, again for a bigger loss than any of the winners we've had.
It's a shame because this systems has done so well previously, is so highly regarded, and when the vendor gets it right, it's a pleasure to watch.
[Show Less] |
|
|
|
|
Aug 4, 2008 |
Reviewer: AutoTrader of system |
|
|
The System doesn’t works now. I think it would be better to choose another system. The average per winning trade is 1200$ and the average per loosing trade is 1533$ in the last four month. But the win/loss ratio drops from 80% to 50%. It was a very gut system, but it would be better to wait until the win/loss ratio arises again to 75%. |
|
|
|
|
|
May 20, 2008 |
Reviewer: AutoTrader of system |
|
|
The trader tries to do a good job catching counter trends, and while the profitable trades to loses is exceptional over a 12 month period, the risk to reward seems (or at this time of this review) to be out of skew which may be as a result is showing more frequent losses in recent months plus the change in market dynamics in recent months as well might be posing an issue - not sure. |
|
|
|
 |
July 21, 2008 |
Reviewer: AutoTrader of system |
|
|
A few other systems I subscribed gave much better results than this, and cost 1/2 to 1/3 of the price only. If it charges $199 per month with infrequent trade signals, I would expect the prob of win is > 85%. This proves that higher price does not mean better!
I think that I would have traded better by just flipping a coin than by using this system. So I've un-subscribed it and never looked back again. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hold mouse over gray text for context-sensitive help.
|
|
System Description |
The system developer writes:
Have fun is a discretionary method, trading ER2. This is a swing system. This system makes a few transactions per month. An average duration of one signal can vary from a few hours to two-three days. I strongly believe that a high number of transaction is not necessary to obtain good results. I always look for transactions which give a high probability of success.
I always protect my open position (even if I don’t send stop loss order immediately). I am a defensive trader, which means that I always protect my capital first and only then try to earn some money.
All signals are posted during CME session.
I only use market orders and stop orders. I never use limit orders.
My goal is a steady growth of account with reasonable DD.
MM should be adjusted personally.
For [Show Entire]
Have fun is a discretionary method, trading ER2. This is a swing system. This system makes a few transactions per month. An average duration of one signal can vary from a few hours to two-three days. I strongly believe that a high number of transaction is not necessary to obtain good results. I always look for transactions which give a high probability of success.
I always protect my open position (even if I don’t send stop loss order immediately). I am a defensive trader, which means that I always protect my capital first and only then try to earn some money.
All signals are posted during CME session.
I only use market orders and stop orders. I never use limit orders.
My goal is a steady growth of account with reasonable DD.
MM should be adjusted personally.
For my purpose I use:
half position - 3 contracts
one position - 6 contracts
one and a half position - 9 contracts (used only in case of a very high probability of success).
Right now a minimum amount suggested in order to start following my method is 50.000 USD. In this case you divide my MM which I describe above by three.
Once my account raises I will modify MM.
[Show Less]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading Record |
|
The table below shows the hypothetical results that could have been achieved if you started trading this system with $100,000 on April 19, 2007.
If you decide to AutoTrade this system, you can easily trade with a different amount of capital (smaller or larger), and your results will vary accordingly.
These hypothetical results do not include commissions. Since you are not yet a subscriber to this system, we show only trades which have been closed for at least 3 hours below. |
| |
|
| Action | # | Symbol | | Price | Date | C | # | Price | Date | | P/L |
| STO | 3 | @TFSU9 | | 513.25 | | BTC | 3 | | | | ($615) |
 | Low |
|
| $3,690 |
| STO | 3 | @TFSM9 | | 530.40 | | BTC | 3 | | | | ($990) |
 | Normal |
|
| $0 |
| STO | 3 | @TFSM9 | | 512.17 | | BTC | 3 | | | | ($2,977) |
 | n/a |
|
| ($2,977) |
| STO | 3 | @TFSM9 | | 494.19 | | BTC | 3 | | | | ($3,003) |
| n/a |
|
| ($3,003) |
| STO | 3 | @TFSM9 | | 495.50 | | BTC | 3 | | | | ($3,060) |
| n/a |
|
| ($3,060) |
| STO | 3 | @TFSM9 | | 474.10 | | BTC | 3 | | | | ($1,410) |
| Normal |
|
| ($23) |
| STO | 3 | @TFSM9 | | 477.74 | | BTC | 3 | | | | ($466) |
| Low |
|
| $1,723 |
| STO | 3 | @TFSM9 | | 472.91 | | BTC | 3 | | | | n/a |
| No calc |
|
| ($147) |
| STO | 3 | @TFSM9 | | 458.19 | | BTC | 3 | | | | ($3,123) |
 | High |
|
| $116 |
| BTO | 3 | @TFSM9 | | 415.07 | | STC | 3 | | | | ($2,690) |
| High |
|
| ($319) |
| STO | 2 | @TFSM9 | | 394.86 | | BTC | 2 | | | | ($7) |
| Low |
|
| $23 |
| BTO | 2 | @TFSH9 | | 343.97 | | STC | 2 | | | | ($433) |
| Low |
|
| $3,259 |
| BTO | 2 | @TFSH9 | | 391.60 | | STC | 2 | | | | ($480) |
| Low |
|
| $8 |
| BTO | 2 | @TFSH9 | | 403.94 | | STC | 2 | | | | ($1,987) |
| Normal |
|
| $66 |
| STO | 2 | @TFSH9 | | 466.43 | | BTC | 2 | | | | ($93) |
| Low |
|
| ($84) |
| STO | 2 | @TFSH9 | | 460.70 | | BTC | 2 | | | | ($2,045) |
| n/a |
|
| ($2,045) |
| STO | 2 | @TFSH9 | | 463.50 | | BTC | 2 | | | | ($680) |
| Low |
|
| $1,934 |
| STO | 2 | @TFSH9 | | 495.65 | | BTC | 2 | | | | ($2,156) |
| Normal |
|
| ($2,156) |
| STO | 2 | @TFSH9 | | 494.10 | | BTC | 2 | | | | ($360) |
| Low |
|
| $1,965 |
| STO | 2 | @TFSH9 | | 464.10 | | BTC | 2 | | | | ($520) |
| Low |
|
| $2,802 |
| BTO | 2 | @TFSZ8 | | 380 | | STC | 2 | | | | ($1,480) |
| Normal |
|
| $2,534 |
| BTO | 2 | @TFSZ8 | | 452.30 | | STC | 2 | | | | ($1,140) |
| Normal |
|
| ($16) |
| BTO | 2 | @TFSZ8 | | 501.97 | | STC | 2 | | | | ($714) |
| Low |
|
| ($34) |
| BTO | 2 | @TFSZ8 | | 466.12 | | STC | 2 | | | | ($163) |
| Low |
|
| ($30) |
| STO | 2 | @TFSZ8 | | 572.75 | | BTC | 2 | | | | ($1,190) |
| Normal |
|
| $3,750 |
|
|
Important limitations about performance statistics on this page (back to top)
Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely
to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. In fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently
achieved by any particular trading program.
One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical
trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk in actual trading. For example,
the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual
trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program, which cannot be fully
accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all of which can adversely affect actual trading results. If you are interested in the technical details of how we determine hypothetical trade prices, you may read this technical description.
(c) 2008 Collective2 Corporation
| |
