Forum: System: delta-Signal FX
| |
| Subject: | How much is it worth? |
| Posted by: | Ray Tracy (Admin) ( C2 Score: 981 ) |
 |
| |
|
| When: | 6/10/06 (5:14) | |
| Systems: | |
|
|
|
|
| | I have change the subscription fee as free from June, 13. I did it because I feel not comfortable with the drawdown and win rate, and think it is not worth to charge anything from my point of view.
By the way, I would like to know that if this system published as commercial signal service, how much will you pay for this service?
- Ray Tracy -
|
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| |
| Subject: | How much is it worth? |
| Posted by: | Index ( C2 Score: 975 ) |
 |
| |
|
| When: | 6/10/06 (7:43) | |
| Systems: | |
|
|
|
|
| | In response to post by Ray Tracy of 6/10/06 (5:14) I have change the subscription fee as free from June, 13. I did it because I feel not comfortable with the drawdown and win rate, and think it is not worth to charge anything from my point of view....
See entire
fee paid all depends on profitability & performance, as well as stability and other characteristics. Mostly, if one advisor charges $99 a month for S&P trades and another charges $199 a month, and they are similar in performance, then you would expect the $99 to get the majority of the competitive business. But people also expect "service" - does the advisor answer questions?
One guy is charging $500 a trade, and trades a few times a day. how many subscribers will he get? He lives in a dreamworld. |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| |
| Subject: | How much is it worth? |
| Posted by: | MARTY LAU |
 |
| |
|
| When: | 6/10/06 (23:15) | |
|
|
|
|
| | In response to post by Ray Tracy of 6/10/06 (5:14) I have change the subscription fee as free from June, 13. I did it because I feel not comfortable with the drawdown and win rate, and think it is not worth to charge anything from my point of view....
See entire
So far you have an annualized return of near 150% and a historical drawdown of less than 2%, you don't like these results? |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| |
| Subject: | How much is it worth? |
| Posted by: | Ray Tracy (Admin) ( C2 Score: 981 ) |
 |
| |
|
| When: | 6/11/06 (5:09) | |
| Systems: | |
|
|
|
|
| | In response to post by MARTY LAU of 6/10/06 (23:15) So far you have an annualized return of near 150% and a historical drawdown of less than 2%, you don't like these results?
Yes, I am not satisfy with this. Because I found this system has very bad performance in consolidation market situation. If I can suspend trading within consolidation, it will gain a lot of performance.
The consolidation problem has bother me for weeks, I am looking for methmatical way to against it.
|
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| |
| Subject: | How much is it worth? |
| Posted by: | Victor gui ( C2 Score: 809 ) |
 |
| |
|
| When: | 6/11/06 (9:32) | |
| Systems: | |
|
|
|
|
| | In response to post by MARTY LAU of 6/10/06 (23:15) So far you have an annualized return of near 150% and a historical drawdown of less than 2%, you don't like these results?
This system looks great but not that profitable.
Some recent trades were not real because of the C2's bad forex quotes if you check them carefully.
for example:
STO 10 EUR/JPY 143.02499 5/25/06 10:02 BTC 10 138.06000 6/2/06 14:09 ($1,680) 496 pips ;
BTO 10 USD/CHF 1.17870 5/24/06 12:03 STC 10 1.22420 5/29/06 11:00 $0 455 pips
|
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
What is the C2 Score?
Collective2 rates every trading advisor in its database and assigns a score between 100 and 1000.
In general, a rating above 500 is good. A rating above 700 is excellent.
Collective2 Ratings are recalculated daily based on the entire performance history in our database. The exact formula we use is proprietary, but there are several key variables that go into the Collective2 Rating. One of the most important factors is the length of time we have been able to observe the performance of the trader. Another key factor is the amount by which the trader over-performs or under-performs the S&P 500 index. Finally, the choppiness of the trader's results is taken into account. Certainly a more consistent trader will be rated more highly than a trader with erratic results.