Forum: Collective2 Suggestions, Feedback, Questions
| |
| Subject: | How respect is measured? |
| Posted by: | Pedro Pannon ( C2 Score: 209 ) |
 |
| |
|
| When: | 7/30/09 (9:24) | |
| Systems: | |
|
|
|
|
| | I just saw a link for Old and Respected systems. Old is obvious, but how is respect measured? |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| |
| Subject: | How respect is measured? |
| Posted by: | ironcito |
 |
| |
|
| When: | 7/31/09 (12:14) | |
|
|
|
|
| | In response to post by Pedro Pannon of 7/30/09 (9:24) I just saw a link for Old and Respected systems. Old is obvious, but how is respect measured?
At the beginning of that page, just below the title, is a short description. At the end of that description, it says "(Criteria for list)". Hover your mouse pointer over those words and you will see the answer. |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| |
| Subject: | How respect is measured? |
| Posted by: | Index ( C2 Score: 975 ) |
 |
| |
|
| When: | 7/31/09 (12:54) | |
| Systems: | |
|
|
|
|
| | In response to post by Pedro Pannon of 7/30/09 (9:24) I just saw a link for Old and Respected systems. Old is obvious, but how is respect measured?
on their page "These are systems that have performed well and have been tracked on Trading System Dashboard for at least six months."
Of course, "well" is a debatable concept, depending on equity curve and system stats... |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
What is the C2 Score?
Collective2 rates every trading advisor in its database and assigns a score between 100 and 1000.
In general, a rating above 500 is good. A rating above 700 is excellent.
Collective2 Ratings are recalculated daily based on the entire performance history in our database. The exact formula we use is proprietary, but there are several key variables that go into the Collective2 Rating. One of the most important factors is the length of time we have been able to observe the performance of the trader. Another key factor is the amount by which the trader over-performs or under-performs the S&P 500 index. Finally, the choppiness of the trader's results is taken into account. Certainly a more consistent trader will be rated more highly than a trader with erratic results.