Forum: System: Longboard
| |
| Subject: | I`m gonna kill this system today. |
| Posted by: | meredith whalen (Admin) ( C2 Score: 613 ) |
 |
| |
|
| When: | 1/20/06 (10:58) | |
| Systems: | |
|
|
|
|
| | My personal trading is going too well to bother with this.It was fun while it lasted. Thx for all that sent me PMs!
Good luck to all. |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| |
| Subject: | I`m gonna kill this system today. |
| Posted by: | Pete * |
|
| |
|
| When: | 1/20/06 (11:13) | |
|
|
|
|
| | In response to post by meredith whalen of 1/20/06 (10:58) My personal trading is going too well to bother with this.It was fun while it lasted. Thx for all that sent me PMs!
Good luck to all.
That raises an interesting problem. Those system vendors who do really well with their own trading will discover that they do not need the revenue from C2 and will stop supporting the system. Thus the vendors we will be left with are those that aren't doing well with their trading and still need subscribers for income.
Oversimplification? Yes, but still food for thought about the natural selection process of system vendors. |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| |
| Subject: | I`m gonna kill this system today. |
| Posted by: | meredith whalen (Admin) ( C2 Score: 613) |
|
| |
|
| When: | 1/20/06 (11:34) | |
| Systems: | |
|
|
|
|
| | In response to post by Pete * of 1/20/06 (11:13) That raises an interesting problem. Those system vendors who do really well with their own trading will discover that they do not need the revenue from C2 and will stop supporting the system. Thus the vendors we will be left with are those that aren't doing well with their trading and still need subscribers for income....
See entire
A sort of reverse survivership bias. Interesting. |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| |
| Subject: | I`m gonna kill this system today. |
| Posted by: | Eu New ( C2 Score: 965) |
|
| |
|
| When: | 1/20/06 (19:05) | |
| Systems: | |
|
|
|
|
| | In response to post by Pete * of 1/20/06 (11:13) That raises an interesting problem. Those system vendors who do really well with their own trading will discover that they do not need the revenue from C2 and will stop supporting the system. Thus the vendors we will be left with are those that aren't doing well with their trading and still need subscribers for income....
See entire
Pete,
Yes, but still food for thought about the natural selection process of system vendors.
Agree ;) Your conclusion is really "food for thoughts".
However, the situation we can call as hmm... "bad exit". It's always better to "sell" your position on high if you can lol
Eu
|
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
What is the C2 Score?
Collective2 rates every trading advisor in its database and assigns a score between 100 and 1000.
In general, a rating above 500 is good. A rating above 700 is excellent.
Collective2 Ratings are recalculated daily based on the entire performance history in our database. The exact formula we use is proprietary, but there are several key variables that go into the Collective2 Rating. One of the most important factors is the length of time we have been able to observe the performance of the trader. Another key factor is the amount by which the trader over-performs or under-performs the S&P 500 index. Finally, the choppiness of the trader's results is taken into account. Certainly a more consistent trader will be rated more highly than a trader with erratic results.
