Forum: System: Ruby NQ100 M
| |
| Subject: | wrong fill of INTU |
| Posted by: | Algimantas B. ( C2 Score: 225 ) |
 |
| |
|
| When: | 11/16/07 (12:00) | |
| Systems: | |
|
|
|
|
| | Hello,
at open positions window I see filled position of INTU.
(BTO 808 28.95 signal ID 29180036). Position was opened
11/15 at 16:00. In fact 11/15 day low price of INTU was 29.11 |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| |
| Subject: | wrong fill of INTU |
| Posted by: | Rene' Koch (Admin) ( C2 Score: 1000) |
|
| |
|
| When: | 11/16/07 (17:30) | |
| Systems: | |
|
|
|
|
| | In response to post by Algimantas B. of 11/16/07 (12:00) Hello,
at open positions window I see filled position of INTU.
(BTO 808 28.95 signal ID 29180036). Position was opened
...
See entire
Please report bad fills directly to C2. You may use the "Report Problem" links which are displayed for every fill/trade if the 'Show "Report Links" Option' is enabled. |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| |
| Subject: | wrong fill of INTU |
| Posted by: | Rene' Koch (Admin) ( C2 Score: 1000) |
|
| |
|
| When: | 11/16/07 (23:05) | |
| Systems: | |
|
|
|
|
| | In response to post by Rene' Koch of 11/16/07 (17:30) Please report bad fills directly to C2. You may use the "Report Problem" links which are displayed for every fill/trade if the 'Show "Report Links" Option' is enabled.
I reported this bad fill to C2 and they removed this trade. It is a pitty, because it showed a nice profit. We want the system realistic however. |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
What is the C2 Score?
Collective2 rates every trading advisor in its database and assigns a score between 100 and 1000.
In general, a rating above 500 is good. A rating above 700 is excellent.
Collective2 Ratings are recalculated daily based on the entire performance history in our database. The exact formula we use is proprietary, but there are several key variables that go into the Collective2 Rating. One of the most important factors is the length of time we have been able to observe the performance of the trader. Another key factor is the amount by which the trader over-performs or under-performs the S&P 500 index. Finally, the choppiness of the trader's results is taken into account. Certainly a more consistent trader will be rated more highly than a trader with erratic results.
